Skip to main content


APRD Survey

Dear Users:

We value your contribution to and use of the Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database (APRD).

The APRD Team is conducting a Survey to gauge users experiences, our objective is to determine how the database enhances research, and to allow for users to provide feedback, suggestions and requests for potential improvements. Please take the anonymous survey using this link: Link to Survey

Thank you for your Participation,
David Mota-Sanchez
Arthropod Resistance Database Director


Reported Resistance Case(s)

Species: anopheles stephensi

Order Family Common Name(s) Group Host
diptera culicidae anopheles mosquito MED

Active Ingredient: chlorpyrifos

MOA: Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors, Organophophates
Group: OP CAS #: 2921882 Shaugnessy Code: 59101

Resistance Case(s)

Case Id Year of Report Type of Resistance Location Reference
G18436 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Karnataka--
Bangalore
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18437 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Karnataka--
Bangalore
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18438 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Gujarat--
Gandhinagar
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18439 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Karnataka--
Bangalore
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18440 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Goa
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18441 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Goa
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18442 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Karnataka--
Bangalore
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18443 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Karnataka--
Bangalore
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18444 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Karnataka--
Bangalore
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
G18445 2016 Field Evolved Resistance
India--
Karnataka--
Bangalore
Hariprasad, T. P. N. and Shetty, Z. J. (2016). Ecological variation and resistance levels to propoxur and chlorpyrifo in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito from India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 36 48-59.
*The population was created solely by selection and/or genetic manipulation.
**The population was selected further in the laboratory after collection.